Owen Roberts: A Switch in Tim

To this day, no one knows quite what to make of Owen J. Roberts, founder of one of Philadelphia's largest law firms, Prosecutor of the Teapot Dome scandal, Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, Republican appointee to the U.S. Supreme Court ? but then, the source of one of the most radical revisions of our system of government since the Declaration of Independence. Little in his prior career seemed to lead up to this action, and nothing in his subsequent civic-minded retirement from the Court seemed to show any radical turn of character had taken place. He has been compared with a famous baseball pitcher who threw right-handed or left-handed at will, and unexpectedly, capriciously ? who knows why.

Franklin Roosevelt

The issue went far beyond one clause in the Constitution, but the ?commerce clause? was the focus point. Under the limited and enumerated powers allowed to Congress but the Constitution was :

?The Congress shall have power?to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes. ?

That used to be called the? Interstate commerce clause? until the Supreme Court announced its decision in the case of Wickard v. Filburn. "When linked with the Tenth Amendment, granting to the States the power to regulate everything not specifically granted to the Federal government, this clause in the Constitution was universally taken to mean that the States had control of commerce within their borders, while Congress would control interstate commerce. Wickard v. Filburn took all that power from the states and gave it to Congress, which henceforth would regulate commerce. John Marshall had certainly triumphed over the hated state legislatures, but the Supreme Court suddenly lost its power to overrule Congress, too. One side had won the argument, by silencing the umpire. No wonder Franklin Roosevelt started annual celebrations called Jefferson-Jackson Day dinners.

Depression of the 1930s

To describe the background, the 1929 stock market crash was quickly followed by the economic" Depression of the 1930s. Nothing of this magnitude had been seen before, and there was a stampede to try new and untested solutions. Even government action which actually worsened economic conditions was felt justified if it conveyed to the frightened public the image that its leaders were taking firm action. Since Socialism and Communism were among the solutions grasped for, many unfortunate actions were felt justified as a way to control the Bolshevik threat. Many of these ?New Deal? actions were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, since they involved sweeping revisions in the way all commerce, internal to the States as well as interstate, was conducted.

Justify Full

The Depression and financial panic continued through the 1936 Presidential election, which Roosevelt won decisively. Immediately after the start of his new term, he announced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court, appointing new ones more to his liking. He was at pains to point out that seven of the nine life incumbents had been appointed by Republican Presidents. This was of course the restraint intended by the Constitutional Convention, and the idea of ?packing? the Court with new appointees was exactly what Jefferson and Jackson had tried to do. In the meantime, the case of Filburn, a dairy farmer, came up. One of the New Deal agencies had assigned him a quota of 200 bushels of wheat he could grow on the side, as part of an effort to raise wheat prices by reducing supply. Filburn had raised 400 bushels, but consumed the extra wheat for his own personal use, hardly a matter of interstate commerce. The Court had repeatedly declared laws like this to exceed the interstate commerce limitation, and were thus unconstitutional for the Congress to enact.

Well, Owen Roberts changed his position, Filburn lost his case, and Congress resoundingly defeated the court-packing law. Forever afterward, this change of position was referred to as ?the switch in time, that saved nine.? And since that time, the Court has rarely had the courage to rule any action of Congress unconstitutional. And furthermore, the power of the state legislatures has shriveled because all commerce (except insurance and real estate) is regulated in the District of Columbia, with a corresponding vast increase in the size of the Federal bureaucracy, as Congress relentlessly pushes to intervene in ? commerce.

A few weeks before he died, Owen Roberts had all his papers burned, So we will never know whether this was the result he had in mind.

(987)