Musings of a Philadelphia Physician who has served the community for six decades

Return to Home

Related Topics

Health and Retirement Savings Accounts: Current Issues and Possible Remedies
If you read it fast, this is a one-page, five-minute summary of Health Savings Accounts.

Questions about Health Savings Accounts

Pertinent Questions: Three Current Tweaks to HSA.

1. Tax Equity. An alternative way to achieve this is to reduce corporate income tax rates, since the tax deduction for donated employee health insurance is the main cause of making health benefits cheaper for the employer than wages would be. And health benefits are the main reason corporations pay so little of the published tax rate. Once benefits are equal they can be reduced, as eighty years have demonstrated. Tax equity first, then reduction, is the only way to reduce taxes.

2. The transition-to-a-cheaper-system needs help, time, and more brackets for those who are already close to retirement. The private sector is inherently more flexible than the public one in dealing with inflation, stock market volatility, and changing occupations. However, the public sector could be readily streamlined a great deal.

3. Longer durations for compound interest adds flexibility and far greater returns without added cost to the government or client. In long durations, 6.5% returns rise far more rapidly than 3% inflation. This spread is an inherent feature of compound interest. The spread between the curves at 11%/3% is astounding -- and costless.

Pertinent Questions: Four Future Deep-Rooted Changes For Health Care, using HSA.

1. Although the whole-life insurance industry managed to do it, a 90-year transition period is very difficult to plan for. The last-year of life proposal cuts the transition period to a manageable size, while providing funding from the start. The first-year of life addresses the otherwise almost impossible task of pre-funding the year of your birth. The present extended period of education before employment is being addressed by a declining birth rate. National defense alone argues this is an unwise policy to pursue. Luckily, the anti-perpetuity laws allow inheritance up to one life-span plus 21 years, an adequate period. The great danger in this is a revenue-starved government. Unfortunately, if public sector revenue became 100%, they would still claim to be starved.

2. The public does not realize that Medicare is 50% subsidized, and therefore a single payer system aspires for the same treatment. We are already borrowing from the Chinese to pay for Medicare. As long as we have nation states, this is too dangerous to continue. Although Medicare is regarded as sacrosanct, anything which cannot continue will stop, one way or another.

3. The balance between the harmful effects of having a rentier class must be balanced against the harmful effect (of overtaxing them) on the incentives of elderly rich people. So the proper balance probably varies with the state of the economy. When two thirds of the population are to some degree rentiers, the situation must be approached with care. More retired people must be employed at home, while the finance industry must make more effort to prove its worth.

4. The business school and the law school are fast replacing the medical school as the preferred route to control medical care. The computer industry is not yet ready to join them. Controlling the hours and conditions of the workplace is not an acceptable route to control of a service industry, and in the long run is self-defeating. The only way to gain respect of a professional is to be able to do what the professional does, only better. Just how you accomplish that without going to medical school has not yet been explained, and "price fixing" is not an adequate description of its essence. The Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO) devised by Senator Wallace Bennett of Utah comes pretty close, and although the AMA narrowly rejected it, reconsideration is recommended.


Please Let Us Know What You Think

(HTML tags provide better formatting)

Because of robot spam we ask you to confirm your comment: we will send you an email containing a link to click. We apologize for this inconvenience but this ensures the quality of the comments. (Your email will not be displayed.)
Thank you.