PHILADELPHIA REFLECTIONS
Musings of a Philadelphia Physician who has served the community for six decades

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related Topics

The Constitution
The Constitution was not just a paper written at a convention. It was a choice between uncertain alternatives, and new difficulties soon were revealed by making those choices. Its reliance on compromise displays the powerful influence of 18th Century Quaker Philadelphia.

Shaping the Constitution in Philadelphia
After Independence, the weakness of the Federal government dismayed a band of ardent patriots, so under Washington's leadership a stronger Constitution was written. Almost immediately, comrades discovered they had wanted the same thing for different reasons, so during the formative period they struggled to reshape future directions . Moving the Capitol from Philadelphia to the Potomac proved curiously central to all this.

Signers and Non-Signers of the Constitution

{Signers of The Constitution}
Signers of The Constitution

John Dickinson was an active participant in designing both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, but he signed neither one of them. His position on the Declaration was that England had certainly behaved in an offensive way; but the situation was getting better and it was still possible to patch things up, even with a British fleet in New York harbor displaying hostile intent. His later position on the Constitution is less clear. Dickinson asked George Read to sign his name, because he was sick. Whether this was a real illness or a diplomatic illness is not readily known.

Three active delegates made no bones about their opposition to the final product: John Randolph and George Mason of Virginia were not mollified by private assurances that a Bill of Rights was necessary but could be added later; they refused to sign a constitution that did not currently include this most passionate of their demands. There is little doubt of their sincerity, but any politician today would recognize that they also needed to protect their flank from Patrick Henry who smelled a rat and stayed at home denouncing the whole enterprise. Henry was a powerful speaker, representing the Scotch-Irish Virginia piedmont area. In Scotland, Ireland and America, that group had been abused by perfidious English kings three times, and wanted iron-clad protection against any backsliding to English rule or English government models. It's quite possible that Virginia's George Wythe and James McClurg left the convention early in order to avoid the local political consequences of signing the document, or the equally uncomfortable stance of opposing the clear leadership of George Washington. Some idea of the feelings of Virginia can be gained by noticing that of the seven delegates sent by Virginia, only John Blair joined the two instigators, George Washington and James Madison, in signing public approval. A majority of the Virginia delegation thus ducked enthusiastic endorsement of their local iconic hero, and in the long run Virginia held back on ratification until only one last vote was needed for enactment. Without George Washington, there can be little doubt the whole effort would have failed. Indeed, a case could be made that the location of the District of Columbia and the election of Virginians as four of the first five presidents had some of the characteristics of trying to persuade the six hundred pound Virginia gorilla to play nice.

Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts similarly refused to sign a constitution which did not include a Bill of Rights. However, Gerry is the politician responsible for inventing the technique of packing his opposition into one voting district (by shifting its borders) so his own party could win narrow majorities in several other districts. This sleazy manipulation of loopholes in the system has forever after been known as Gerrymandering, and raises a question perhaps unfairly, of where Gerry actually stood on every other issue in the Constitutional Convention. By contrast, it is impossible to imagine George Washington doing such a thing, and quite possible to imagine he would never again speak to someone who did.

In addition to the three delegates who stayed to the end but refused to sign, an additional four left early to demonstrate their protest: John Lansing and Robert Yates of New York; and Luther Martin and John Mercer of Maryland.

We are left less clear about the opinions of seven more who simply left the convention early (Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut, William Houstoun and William Pierce of Georgia, Caleb Strong of Massachusetts, William Houston of New Jersey, and William Davie and Alexander Martin of North Carolina.) The same uncertainty extends to the eighteen delegates who were invited to attend but either refused or regretted their inability to attend: (Erastus Wolcott of Connecticut, Nathaniel Pendleton and George Walton of Georgia, Charles Carroll, Gabriel Duvall, Robert Hanson Harrison, Thomas Sim Lee, and Thomas Stone of Maryland, Francis Dana of Massachusetts, John Pickering and Benjamin West of New Hampshire, Abraham Clark and John Neilson of New Jersey, Richard Caswell and Willie Jones of North Carolina, Henry Laurens of South Carolina, and Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, and Thomas Nelson of Virginia). These men were originally selected because of their local eminence, so some of them may not have been able to spend several months in a City that took days to reach on horseback. On the other hand, we certainly know where Patrick Henry stood and the large number of other abstentions from certain states suggests more than personal inconvenience was involved. After all, Rhode Island refused even to nominate anyone. In this last case, a political issue was highlighted. The Articles of Confederation which were being replaced not only required unanimous consent to change them, but they affirmed the Articles to be permanent. Under ordinary contract law, that would be dispositive. But George Washington was hell-bent on replacing the Articles of Confederation, so anything they said would no longer matter.

There remains a need for someone, perhaps in a doctoral thesis, to examine the voluminous correspondence and recollections of the large group of non-signers to assess the true nature of their failure to attend or sign. There was plenty of room for honest disagreement, personal business back at home, illness, or feelings of inadequacy. On the other hand, plenty of other subsequent politicians have exhibited an unwillingness to offend anyone, a hope to seek advantage from both sides, a habitual tendency toward waiting to see who would win before stating their own opinion. Politics would be better without such personal inadequacies, but politics would not be politics without them. In fairness to their quandaries, the voting on the Constitution was by states, requiring nine to adopt it. If the vote of their state was a foregone conclusion, some delegates probably had a right to go home and let it happen in their absence. In the case of Alexander Hamilton, here stood the single New York delegate in attendance at the final signing. Since he had been agitating for this sort of reform for seven years before Madison and Washington convinced each other, it seems possible that others withdrew to let him have the lime light. There is little doubt the single remaining responsibility of the signers was to go home and "deliver" their state for ratification, and Hamilton went at that with a vengeance. Although the moment of final signing appears on portraits and in sculpture, it was only the beginning of the battle for adoption, not the final victory. Indeed the Constitution as we now perceive it did not take more or less final form until the early government shaped its actual operation. Most of that shaping process also took place in Philadelphia, during the first ten years while the seat of government was still located there. Many if not most of the elected members of the First Congress had been members of the Constitutional Convention, returning to Philadelphia to finish the job by making a good beginning to the country.

Signers of the Constitution.
{George Washington}
George Washington
{George Reed, Delaware}
George Reed, Delaware
{Gunning Bedford, Jr., Delaware}
Gunning Bedford, Jr., Delaware
{John Dickinson, Delaware}
John Dickinson, Delaware
{Richard Bassett, Delaware}
Richard Bassett, Delaware
{Jacob Broom, Delaware}
Jacob Broom, Delaware
{James McHenry, Maryland}
James McHenry, Maryland
{Daniel of St. Tomas Jenifer, Maryland}
Daniel of St. Tomas Jenifer, Maryland
{Daniel Carroll, Maryland}
Daniel Carroll, Maryland
{John Blair, Virginia}
John Blair, Virginia
{James Madison, Jr., Virginia}
James Madison, Jr., Virginia
{William Blount, North Carolina}
William Blount, North Carolina
{Richard Dobbs Spaight, North Carolina}
Richard Dobbs Spaight, North Carolina
{Hugh Williamson, North Carolina}
Hugh Williamson, North Carolina
{John Rutledge, South Carolina}
John Rutledge, South Carolina
{Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, South Carolina}
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, South Carolina
{Charles Pinckney, South Carolina}
Charles Pinckney, South Carolina
{Pierce Butler, South Carolina}
Pierce Butler, South Carolina
{William Few, Georgia}
William Few, Georgia
{Abraham Baldwin, Georgia}
Abraham Baldwin, Georgia
{John Langdon, New Hampshire}
John Langdon, New Hampshire
{Nicholas Gilman, New Hampshire}
Nicholas Gilman, New Hampshire
{Nathaniel Gorham, Massachusetts}
Nathaniel Gorham, Massachusetts
{Rufus King, Massachusetts}
Rufus King, Massachusetts
{William Samuel Johnson, Connecticut}
William Samuel Johnson, Connecticut
{Roger Sherman, Connecticut}
Roger Sherman, Connecticut
{Alexander Hamilton, New York}
Alexander Hamilton, New York
{William Livingston, New Jersey}
William Livingston, New Jersey
{David Brearly, New Jersey}
David Brearly, New Jersey
{William Paterson, New Jersey}
William Paterson, New Jersey
{Jonathan Dayton, New Jersey}
Jonathan Dayton, New Jersey
{Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania}
Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania
{Thomas Mifflin, Pennsylvania}
Thomas Mifflin, Pennsylvania
{Robert Morris, Pennsylvania}
Robert Morris, Pennsylvania
{George Clymer, Pennsylvania}
George Clymer, Pennsylvania
{Thomas Fitzsimons, Pennsylvania}
Thomas Fitzsimons, Pennsylvania
{Jared Ingersoll, Pennsylvania}
Jared Ingersoll, Pennsylvania
{James Wilson, Pennsylvania}
James Wilson, Pennsylvania
{Gourvernor Morris, Pennsylvania}
Gourvernor Morris, Pennsylvania

Non-Signers of the Constitution

{Oliver Ellsworth, Connecticut}
Oliver Ellsworth, Connecticut
{William Houstoun, Georgia}
William Houstoun, Georgia
{Caleb Strong, Massachusetts}
Caleb Strong, Massachusetts
{William Davie, North Carolina}
William Davie, North Carolina
{Alexander Martin, North Carolina}
Alexander Martin, North Carolina
{George Walton, Georgia}
George Walton, Georgia
{Charles Carroll, Maryland}
Charles Carroll, Maryland
{Gabriel Duvall, Maryland}
Gabriel Duvall, Maryland
{Thomas Stone, Maryland}
Thomas Stone, Maryland
{Francis Dana, Massachusetts}
Francis Dana, Massachusetts
{Benjamin West, New Hampshire}
Benjamin West, New Hampshire
{Abraham Clark, New Jersey}
Abraham Clark, New Jersey
{Richard Caswell, North Carolina}
Richard Caswell, North Carolina
{Willie Jones, North Carolina}
Willie Jones, North Carolina
{Henry Laurens, South Carolina}
Henry Laurens, South Carolina
{Patrick Henry, Virginia}
Patrick Henry, Virginia
{Richard Henry Lee, Virginia}
Richard Henry Lee, Virginia
{Thomas Nelson, Virginia}
Thomas Nelson, Virginia

(1561)

Posted by: [none]    |    Jan 4, 2012 8:02 PM 8923
Posted by: [none]    |    Jan 4, 2012 8:02 PM 8922
This was very helpful, thanks
Posted by: Brittany    |    Nov 27, 2011 2:42 PM 8882
I'm in a play about the constitution so I needed to see how they dressed back then... thanks for the help guys
Posted by: Mackenzie    |    May 22, 2010 9:55 AM 7165
Luther Martin signed the Declaration of Independence, but not only did not sign the Constitution, but voted against it, and denounced it. He did not like strong central governments, English, American, or any other kind.
Posted by: GRF    |    Jan 22, 2010 2:45 PM 5889
Was Luther Martin a signer or a non-signer? I have to do a project on him and I don't know what to think.
Posted by: Confused Student    |    Jan 21, 2010 9:08 PM 5887
Please enter your comments here

Name

Comments